SpecDirectory

Black + Decker BCRDK32*vsWhirlpool WHR31TS4E

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Black + Decker BCRDK32*

Capacity

3.1cu ft

Annual Energy

321kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Dimensions

18.7 × 32.8in (w × h)

Whirlpool WHR31TS4E

Capacity

3cu ft

Annual Energy

320kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

11%

Dimensions

19.1 × 33in (w × h)

Key differences

Both models are closely matched on annual energy: 321 vs 320 kWh/yr. The Black + Decker BCRDK32* is larger at 3.1 cu ft versus 3 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecBlack + DeckerWhirlpool
Total Volume(cu ft)3.13
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)3.83.8

Dimensions

SpecBlack + DeckerWhirlpool
Height(in)32.833
Width(in)18.719.1

Energy

SpecBlack + DeckerWhirlpool
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)321320
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)358358
Better Than Standard(%)1011
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecBlack + DeckerWhirlpool
TypeCompact RefrigeratorCompact Refrigerator
Product Class12 - Compact Refrigerator-Freezer - partial automatic defrost12 - Compact Refrigerator-Freezer - partial automatic defrost
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoNo
Built InNoNo
CompactYesYes
Ice MakerNoNo
Through-the-Door DispenserNoNo

Connectivity

SpecBlack + DeckerWhirlpool
ConnectedNoNo

More comparisons