Ca’Lefort CLF-WD428vsFisher & Paykel RS32(X)
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Ca’Lefort CLF-WD428
Capacity
14.8cu ft
Annual Energy
235kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
14%
Dimensions
23.4 × 69.1in (w × h)
Fisher & Paykel RS32(X)
Capacity
14.7cu ft
Annual Energy
541kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
10%
Dimensions
31.1 × 71.9in (w × h)
Key differences
Ca’Lefort CLF-WD428 is 57% more efficient at 235 kWh/yr versus 541 kWh/yr for the Fisher & Paykel RS32(X). The Ca’Lefort CLF-WD428 is larger at 14.8 cu ft versus 14.7 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Ca’Lefort | Fisher & Paykel |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 14.8 | 14.7 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 15 | 18.2 |
Dimensions
| Spec | Ca’Lefort | Fisher & Paykel |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 69.1 | 71.9 |
| Width(in) | 23.4 | 31.1 |
Energy
| Spec | Ca’Lefort | Fisher & Paykel |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 235 | 541 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 274 | 592 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 14 | 10 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Ca’Lefort | Fisher & Paykel |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cooler | Bottom Freezer |
| Product Class | 4 - Freestanding Cooler | 5I-BI - Built-In Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service |
| Defrost Type | — | Automatic |
| Counter Depth | No | No |
| Built In | No | Yes |
| Compact | No | No |
| Ice Maker | No | Yes |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Ca’Lefort | Fisher & Paykel |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-600a | — |
| GWP Rating | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Ca’Lefort | Fisher & Paykel |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |