COSTWAY ES10328US-WHvsDGUAM V2
Side-by-side dehumidifier comparison
COSTWAY ES10328US-WH
Water Removal
15.5pints/day
Efficiency
1.75L/kWh
Annual Energy
191kWh/yr
Refrigerant
R290
DGUAM V2
Water Removal
15.3pints/day
Efficiency
1.80L/kWh
Annual Energy
183kWh/yr
Type
Portable Dehumidifier
Key differences
DGUAM V2 is 3% more efficient at 1.80 L/kWh versus 1.75 L/kWh for the COSTWAY ES10328US-WH. The COSTWAY ES10328US-WH is larger at 15.5 pints/day versus 15.3 pints/day.
Performance
| Spec | COSTWAY | DGUAM |
|---|---|---|
| Water Removal Capacity(pints/day) | 15.5 | 15.3 |
| Integrated Energy Factor(L/kWh) | 1.75 | 1.80 |
| Annual Energy Consumption(kWh/yr) | 191 | 183 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | COSTWAY | DGUAM |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R290 | — |
| Charge(oz) | 2.1 | 2.8 |
Configuration
| Spec | COSTWAY | DGUAM |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Portable Dehumidifier | Portable Dehumidifier |
| Connected Capable | No | No |