COSTWAY ES10328US-WHvsOGACFO YOLFHM079WH
Side-by-side dehumidifier comparison
COSTWAY ES10328US-WH
Water Removal
15.5pints/day
Efficiency
1.75L/kWh
Annual Energy
191kWh/yr
Refrigerant
R290
OGACFO YOLFHM079WH
Water Removal
15.8pints/day
Efficiency
1.76L/kWh
Annual Energy
194kWh/yr
Refrigerant
R290/60g
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on efficiency: 1.75 vs 1.76 L/kWh. The OGACFO YOLFHM079WH is larger at 15.8 pints/day versus 15.5 pints/day.
Performance
| Spec | COSTWAY | OGACFO |
|---|---|---|
| Water Removal Capacity(pints/day) | 15.5 | 15.8 |
| Integrated Energy Factor(L/kWh) | 1.75 | 1.76 |
| Annual Energy Consumption(kWh/yr) | 191 | 194 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | COSTWAY | OGACFO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R290 | R290/60g |
| Charge(oz) | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Configuration
| Spec | COSTWAY | OGACFO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Portable Dehumidifier | Portable Dehumidifier |
| Connected Capable | No | Yes |