Danby DBC031L1SSvsWhirlpool WHR31TS4E
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Danby DBC031L1SS
Capacity
3.1cu ft
Annual Energy
115kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
36%
Well above minimum
Dimensions
18.9 × 33.5in (w × h)
Whirlpool WHR31TS4E
Capacity
3cu ft
Annual Energy
320kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
11%
Dimensions
19.1 × 33in (w × h)
Key differences
Danby DBC031L1SS is 64% more efficient at 115 kWh/yr versus 320 kWh/yr for the Whirlpool WHR31TS4E. The Danby DBC031L1SS is larger at 3.1 cu ft versus 3 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Danby | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 3.1 | 3 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 3.1 | 3.8 |
Dimensions
| Spec | Danby | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 33.5 | 33 |
| Width(in) | 18.9 | 19.1 |
Energy
| Spec | Danby | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 115 | 320 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 180 | 358 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 36 | 11 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Danby | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Cooler | Compact Refrigerator |
| Product Class | 3 - Freestanding Compact Cooler | 12 - Compact Refrigerator-Freezer - partial automatic defrost |
| Defrost Type | — | Automatic |
| Counter Depth | No | No |
| Built In | No | No |
| Compact | Yes | Yes |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Connectivity
| Spec | Danby | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |