SpecDirectory

Danby or Danby Designer DAR033A1*vsWhirlpool WHR33MBKE

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Danby or Danby Designer DAR033A1*

Capacity

3.3cu ft

Annual Energy

259kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

11%

Dimensions

17.7 × 33.1in (w × h)

Whirlpool WHR33MBKE

Capacity

3.2cu ft

Annual Energy

218kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

11%

Dimensions

17.5 × 33.2in (w × h)

Key differences

Whirlpool WHR33MBKE is 16% more efficient at 218 kWh/yr versus 259 kWh/yr for the Danby or Danby Designer DAR033A1*. The Danby or Danby Designer DAR033A1* is larger at 3.3 cu ft versus 3.2 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecDanby or Danby DesignerWhirlpool
Total Volume(cu ft)3.33.2
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)3.33.2

Dimensions

SpecDanby or Danby DesignerWhirlpool
Height(in)33.133.2
Width(in)17.717.5

Energy

SpecDanby or Danby DesignerWhirlpool
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)259218
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)290244
Better Than Standard(%)1111
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecDanby or Danby DesignerWhirlpool
TypeCompact RefrigeratorCompact Refrigerator
Product Class13A - Compact All-Refrigerators - automatic defrost11A - Compact All-Refrigerator - manual defrost
Defrost TypeAutomaticManual
Counter DepthNoNo
Built InNoNo
CompactYesYes
Ice MakerNoNo
Through-the-Door DispenserNoNo

Connectivity

SpecDanby or Danby DesignerWhirlpool
ConnectedNoNo

More comparisons