Fisher & Paykel RF135B*****vsLG LT13C2000*
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Fisher & Paykel RF135B*****
Capacity
13.3cu ft
Annual Energy
411kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
11%
Dimensions
25 × 67.5in (w × h)
LG LT13C2000*
Capacity
13.2cu ft
Annual Energy
300kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
17%
Most Efficient
Dimensions
27.5 × 67.8in (w × h)
Key differences
LG LT13C2000* is 27% more efficient at 300 kWh/yr versus 411 kWh/yr for the Fisher & Paykel RF135B*****. The Fisher & Paykel RF135B***** is larger at 13.3 cu ft versus 13.2 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | LG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 13.3 | 13.2 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 16.4 | 15.7 |
Dimensions
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | LG |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 67.5 | 67.8 |
| Width(in) | 25 | 27.5 |
Energy
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | LG |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 411 | 300 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 462 | 360 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 11 | 17 |
| Most Efficient | No | Yes |
Configuration
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | LG |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Bottom Freezer | Top Freezer |
| Product Class | 5 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer without an automatic ice maker | 3 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer without an automatic ice maker |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Counter Depth | No | No |
| Built In | No | No |
| Compact | No | No |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | LG |
|---|---|---|
| Type | — | R-600a |
| GWP Rating | — | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | LG |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |