Fisher & Paykel RS2435V2*T*vsWhirlpool WHR43S1E
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Fisher & Paykel RS2435V2*T*
Capacity
4.3cu ft
Annual Energy
52kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
73%
Well above minimum
Dimensions
23.3 × 35.3in (w × h)
Whirlpool WHR43S1E
Capacity
4.2cu ft
Annual Energy
228kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
10%
Dimensions
19.9 × 32.9in (w × h)
Key differences
Fisher & Paykel RS2435V2*T* is 77% more efficient at 52 kWh/yr versus 228 kWh/yr for the Whirlpool WHR43S1E. The Fisher & Paykel RS2435V2*T* is larger at 4.3 cu ft versus 4.2 cu ft. Overall, the Whirlpool WHR43S1E sits higher in the category, ranking above 19% of certified residential refrigerators.
Capacity
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Dimensions
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 35.3 | 32.9 |
| Width(in) | 23.3 | 19.9 |
Energy
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 52 | 228 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 190 | 252 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 73 | 10 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Cooler | Compact Refrigerator |
| Product Class | 1 - Built-in Compact Cooler | 11A - Compact All-Refrigerator - manual defrost |
| Defrost Type | — | Manual |
| Counter Depth | No | No |
| Built In | Yes | No |
| Compact | Yes | Yes |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-600a | — |
| GWP Rating | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |