SpecDirectory

Fisher & Paykel RS24SvsTHORKITCHEN XRF24CRF

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Fisher & Paykel RS24S

Capacity

12.4cu ft

Annual Energy

232kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

29%

Well above minimum
Dimensions

23.9 × 83.6in (w × h)

THORKITCHEN XRF24CRF

Capacity

12.5cu ft

Annual Energy

295kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Dimensions

23.7 × 83.6in (w × h)

Key differences

Fisher & Paykel RS24S is 21% more efficient at 232 kWh/yr versus 295 kWh/yr for the THORKITCHEN XRF24CRF. The THORKITCHEN XRF24CRF is larger at 12.5 cu ft versus 12.4 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecFisher & PaykelTHORKITCHEN
Total Volume(cu ft)12.412.5
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)12.412.5

Dimensions

SpecFisher & PaykelTHORKITCHEN
Height(in)83.683.6
Width(in)23.923.7

Energy

SpecFisher & PaykelTHORKITCHEN
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)232295
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)328329
Better Than Standard(%)2910
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecFisher & PaykelTHORKITCHEN
TypeFreezerless and Single DoorFreezerless and Single Door
Product Class3A-BI - Built-In All-Refrigerators - automatic defrost3A-BI - Built-In All-Refrigerators - automatic defrost
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoNo
Built InYesYes
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerNoNo
Through-the-Door DispenserNoNo

Connectivity

SpecFisher & PaykelTHORKITCHEN
ConnectedNoNo

More comparisons