SpecDirectory

Fisher & Paykel RS30SH*E*vsVesta VRF-ALASKA-33SS

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Fisher & Paykel RS30SH*E*

Capacity

16.7cu ft

Annual Energy

135kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

63%

Well above minimum
Dimensions

23.8 × 84in (w × h)

Vesta VRF-ALASKA-33SS

Capacity

16.6cu ft

Annual Energy

425kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

15%

Dimensions

32.9 × 70.1in (w × h)

Key differences

Fisher & Paykel RS30SH*E* is 68% more efficient at 135 kWh/yr versus 425 kWh/yr for the Vesta VRF-ALASKA-33SS. The Fisher & Paykel RS30SH*E* is larger at 16.7 cu ft versus 16.6 cu ft. Overall, the Vesta VRF-ALASKA-33SS sits higher in the category, ranking above 58% of certified residential refrigerators.

Capacity

SpecFisher & PaykelVesta
Total Volume(cu ft)16.716.6
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)16.720.4

Dimensions

SpecFisher & PaykelVesta
Height(in)8470.1
Width(in)23.832.9

Energy

SpecFisher & PaykelVesta
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)135425
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)362498
Better Than Standard(%)6315
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecFisher & PaykelVesta
TypeFreezerless and Single DoorBottom Freezer
Product Class3A-BI - Built-In All-Refrigerators - automatic defrost5 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer without an automatic ice maker
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthYesNo
Built InYesNo
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerNoNo
Through-the-Door DispenserNoNo

Refrigerant

SpecFisher & PaykelVesta
TypeR-600a—
GWP RatingR-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)—

Connectivity

SpecFisher & PaykelVesta
ConnectedNoNo

More comparisons