SpecDirectory

Gaggenau RC492704vsHOUSE KOBO UR-BCD572WX-SQ-WZ

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Gaggenau RC492704

Capacity

20.6cu ft

Annual Energy

313kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

21%

Well above minimum
Dimensions

36 × 83.7in (w × h)

HOUSE KOBO UR-BCD572WX-SQ-WZ

Capacity

20.5cu ft

Annual Energy

390kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Most Efficient
Dimensions

30 × 67in (w × h)

Key differences

Gaggenau RC492704 is 20% more efficient at 313 kWh/yr versus 390 kWh/yr for the HOUSE KOBO UR-BCD572WX-SQ-WZ. The Gaggenau RC492704 is larger at 20.6 cu ft versus 20.5 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecGaggenauHOUSE KOBO
Total Volume(cu ft)20.620.5
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)20.625

Dimensions

SpecGaggenauHOUSE KOBO
Height(in)83.767
Width(in)3630

Energy

SpecGaggenauHOUSE KOBO
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)313390
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)394435
Better Than Standard(%)2110
Most EfficientNoYes

Configuration

SpecGaggenauHOUSE KOBO
TypeFreezerless and Single DoorTop Freezer
Product Class3A-BI - Built-In All-Refrigerators - automatic defrost3 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer without an automatic ice maker
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoNo
Built InYesNo
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerNoNo
Through-the-Door DispenserNoNo

Refrigerant

SpecGaggenauHOUSE KOBO
Type—R-600a
GWP Rating—R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Connectivity

SpecGaggenauHOUSE KOBO
ConnectedNoNo

More comparisons