Jack&Rose DH02vsKeepGlad FDD20-5270ZV1R5-E
Side-by-side dehumidifier comparison
Jack&Rose DH02
Water Removal
16.1pints/day
Efficiency
1.90L/kWh
Annual Energy
182kWh/yr
Refrigerant
R290
KeepGlad FDD20-5270ZV1R5-E
Water Removal
16pints/day
Efficiency
1.78L/kWh
Annual Energy
195kWh/yr
Refrigerant
R290
Key differences
Jack&Rose DH02 is 6% more efficient at 1.90 L/kWh versus 1.78 L/kWh for the KeepGlad FDD20-5270ZV1R5-E. The Jack&Rose DH02 is larger at 16.1 pints/day versus 16 pints/day.
Performance
| Spec | Jack&Rose | KeepGlad |
|---|---|---|
| Water Removal Capacity(pints/day) | 16.1 | 16 |
| Integrated Energy Factor(L/kWh) | 1.90 | 1.78 |
| Annual Energy Consumption(kWh/yr) | 182 | 195 |
| Most Efficient | Yes | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Jack&Rose | KeepGlad |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R290 | R290 |
| Charge(oz) | 2.1 | 2.8 |
Configuration
| Spec | Jack&Rose | KeepGlad |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Portable Dehumidifier | Portable Dehumidifier |
| Connected Capable | No | No |