Jack&Rose DH02vsOGACFO YOLFHM079WH
Side-by-side dehumidifier comparison
Jack&Rose DH02
Water Removal
16.1pints/day
Efficiency
1.90L/kWh
Annual Energy
182kWh/yr
Refrigerant
R290
OGACFO YOLFHM079WH
Water Removal
15.8pints/day
Efficiency
1.76L/kWh
Annual Energy
194kWh/yr
Refrigerant
R290/60g
Key differences
Jack&Rose DH02 is 7% more efficient at 1.90 L/kWh versus 1.76 L/kWh for the OGACFO YOLFHM079WH. The Jack&Rose DH02 is larger at 16.1 pints/day versus 15.8 pints/day.
Performance
| Spec | Jack&Rose | OGACFO |
|---|---|---|
| Water Removal Capacity(pints/day) | 16.1 | 15.8 |
| Integrated Energy Factor(L/kWh) | 1.90 | 1.76 |
| Annual Energy Consumption(kWh/yr) | 182 | 194 |
| Most Efficient | Yes | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Jack&Rose | OGACFO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R290 | R290/60g |
| Charge(oz) | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Configuration
| Spec | Jack&Rose | OGACFO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Portable Dehumidifier | Portable Dehumidifier |
| Connected Capable | No | Yes |