Kenmore 17747vsXO XOU15WOFR
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Kenmore 17747
Capacity
3.4cu ft
Annual Energy
220kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
11%
Dimensions
19.1 × 32.8in (w × h)
XO XOU15WOFR
Capacity
3.3cu ft
Annual Energy
143kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
21%
Well above minimum
Dimensions
23.8 × 34.1in (w × h)
Key differences
XO XOU15WOFR is 35% more efficient at 143 kWh/yr versus 220 kWh/yr for the Kenmore 17747. The Kenmore 17747 is larger at 3.4 cu ft versus 3.3 cu ft. Overall, the Kenmore 17747 sits higher in the category, ranking above 16% of certified residential refrigerators.
Capacity
| Spec | Kenmore | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 3.4 | 3.3 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 3.4 | 3.3 |
Dimensions
| Spec | Kenmore | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 32.8 | 34.1 |
| Width(in) | 19.1 | 23.8 |
Energy
| Spec | Kenmore | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 220 | 143 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 246 | 182 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 11 | 21 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Kenmore | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Refrigerator | Compact Cooler |
| Product Class | 11A - Compact All-Refrigerator - manual defrost | 3 - Freestanding Compact Cooler |
| Defrost Type | Manual | — |
| Counter Depth | No | No |
| Built In | No | No |
| Compact | Yes | Yes |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Connectivity
| Spec | Kenmore | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |