Kenmore KMR11MS2EA16CvsWhirlpool URBC5024PZ
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Kenmore KMR11MS2EA16C
Capacity
11.1cu ft
Annual Energy
249kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
11%
Dimensions
23.6 × 67.1in (w × h)
Whirlpool URBC5024PZ
Capacity
11.2cu ft
Annual Energy
376kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
14%
Dimensions
23.6 × 70.9in (w × h)
Key differences
Kenmore KMR11MS2EA16C is 34% more efficient at 249 kWh/yr versus 376 kWh/yr for the Whirlpool URBC5024PZ. The Whirlpool URBC5024PZ is larger at 11.2 cu ft versus 11.1 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Kenmore | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 11.1 | 11.2 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 11.1 | 13.8 |
Dimensions
| Spec | Kenmore | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 67.1 | 70.9 |
| Width(in) | 23.6 | 23.6 |
Energy
| Spec | Kenmore | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 249 | 376 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 280 | 439 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 11 | 14 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Kenmore | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Freezerless and Single Door | Bottom Freezer |
| Product Class | 3A - All-Refrigerators - automatic defrost | 5 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer without an automatic ice maker |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Counter Depth | No | Yes |
| Built In | No | No |
| Compact | No | No |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Connectivity
| Spec | Kenmore | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |