SpecDirectory

KitchenAid KRBR102ESS**vsSamsung RS22T5201**

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

KitchenAid KRBR102ESS**

Capacity

22.1cu ft

Annual Energy

584kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Dimensions

32.6 × 68.9in (w × h)

Samsung RS22T5201**

Capacity

22cu ft

Annual Energy

640kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

5%

Dimensions

35.9 × 70.1in (w × h)

Key differences

KitchenAid KRBR102ESS** is 9% more efficient at 584 kWh/yr versus 640 kWh/yr for the Samsung RS22T5201**. The KitchenAid KRBR102ESS** is larger at 22.1 cu ft versus 22 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecKitchenAidSamsung
Total Volume(cu ft)22.122
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)2727.6

Dimensions

SpecKitchenAidSamsung
Height(in)68.970.1
Width(in)32.635.9

Energy

SpecKitchenAidSamsung
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)584640
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)640669
Better Than Standard(%)105
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecKitchenAidSamsung
TypeBottom FreezerSide-by-Side
Product Class5I - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service7 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoYes
Built InNoNo
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerYesYes
Through-the-Door DispenserNoYes

Refrigerant

SpecKitchenAidSamsung
Type—R-600a
GWP Rating—R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Connectivity

SpecKitchenAidSamsung
ConnectedNoYes
Connects Using—Wi-Fi
Communication Standard—Smart Energy Profile (SEP) 2.x

More comparisons