SpecDirectory

KOSTCH KOS-36RF*##*-**vsSamsung RS22T5561**

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

KOSTCH KOS-36RF*##*-**

Capacity

21.6cu ft

Annual Energy

658kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Dimensions

35.8 × 69.9in (w × h)

Samsung RS22T5561**

Capacity

21.5cu ft

Annual Energy

636kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

5%

Dimensions

35.9 × 70.1in (w × h)

Key differences

Samsung RS22T5561** is 3% more efficient at 636 kWh/yr versus 658 kWh/yr for the KOSTCH KOS-36RF*##*-**. The KOSTCH KOS-36RF*##*-** is larger at 21.6 cu ft versus 21.5 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecKOSTCHSamsung
Total Volume(cu ft)21.621.5
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)26.727.1

Dimensions

SpecKOSTCHSamsung
Height(in)69.970.1
Width(in)35.835.9

Energy

SpecKOSTCHSamsung
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)658636
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)722664
Better Than Standard(%)105
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecKOSTCHSamsung
TypeBottom FreezerSide-by-Side
Product Class5A - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service7 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoYes
Built InNoNo
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerYesYes
Through-the-Door DispenserYesYes

Refrigerant

SpecKOSTCHSamsung
Type—R-600a
GWP Rating—R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Connectivity

SpecKOSTCHSamsung
ConnectedNoYes
Connects Using—Wi-Fi
Communication Standard—Smart Energy Profile (SEP) 2.x

More comparisons