LG LT11C2000*vsWhirlpool URBC5024PZ
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
LG LT11C2000*
Capacity
11.1cu ft
Annual Energy
291kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
14%
Most Efficient
Dimensions
23.6 × 64.6in (w × h)
Whirlpool URBC5024PZ
Capacity
11.2cu ft
Annual Energy
376kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
14%
Dimensions
23.6 × 70.9in (w × h)
Key differences
LG LT11C2000* is 23% more efficient at 291 kWh/yr versus 376 kWh/yr for the Whirlpool URBC5024PZ. The Whirlpool URBC5024PZ is larger at 11.2 cu ft versus 11.1 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | LG | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 11.1 | 11.2 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 13.2 | 13.8 |
Dimensions
| Spec | LG | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 64.6 | 70.9 |
| Width(in) | 23.6 | 23.6 |
Energy
| Spec | LG | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 291 | 376 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 340 | 439 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 14 | 14 |
| Most Efficient | Yes | No |
Configuration
| Spec | LG | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Top Freezer | Bottom Freezer |
| Product Class | 3 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with top-mounted freezer without an automatic ice maker | 5 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer without an automatic ice maker |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Counter Depth | No | Yes |
| Built In | No | No |
| Compact | No | No |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | LG | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-600a | — |
| GWP Rating | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | LG | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |