Mabe MDU25ESK****vsWhirlpool WRFF3436R*
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Mabe MDU25ESK****
Capacity
24.8cu ft
Annual Energy
610kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
10%
Dimensions
34.9 × 69.6in (w × h)
Whirlpool WRFF3436R*
Capacity
24.7cu ft
Annual Energy
685kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
10%
Dimensions
36 × 71in (w × h)
Key differences
Mabe MDU25ESK**** is 11% more efficient at 610 kWh/yr versus 685 kWh/yr for the Whirlpool WRFF3436R*. The Mabe MDU25ESK**** is larger at 24.8 cu ft versus 24.7 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Mabe | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 24.8 | 24.7 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 30.3 | 29.9 |
Dimensions
| Spec | Mabe | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 69.6 | 71 |
| Width(in) | 34.9 | 36 |
Energy
| Spec | Mabe | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 610 | 685 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 669 | 752 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 10 | 10 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Mabe | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Bottom Freezer | Bottom Freezer |
| Product Class | 5I - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service | 5A - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Counter Depth | No | No |
| Built In | No | No |
| Compact | No | No |
| Ice Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | Yes |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Mabe | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Type | — | R-600a |
| GWP Rating | — | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Mabe | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |