SpecDirectory

Magic Chef MCBM920W1vsSamsung BRB106003**

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Magic Chef MCBM920W1

Capacity

9.2cu ft

Annual Energy

374kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Dimensions

23.8 × 59.8in (w × h)

Samsung BRB106003**

Capacity

9.4cu ft

Annual Energy

399kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Dimensions

21.3 × 69.9in (w × h)

Key differences

Magic Chef MCBM920W1 is 6% more efficient at 374 kWh/yr versus 399 kWh/yr for the Samsung BRB106003**. The Samsung BRB106003** is larger at 9.4 cu ft versus 9.2 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecMagic ChefSamsung
Total Volume(cu ft)9.29.4
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)11.311.4

Dimensions

SpecMagic ChefSamsung
Height(in)59.869.9
Width(in)23.821.3

Energy

SpecMagic ChefSamsung
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)374399
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)417444
Better Than Standard(%)1010
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecMagic ChefSamsung
TypeBottom FreezerBottom Freezer
Product Class5 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer without an automatic ice maker5-BI - Built-In Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer without an automatic icemaker
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoNo
Built InNoYes
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerNoNo
Through-the-Door DispenserNoNo

Refrigerant

SpecMagic ChefSamsung
Type—R-600a
GWP Rating—R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Connectivity

SpecMagic ChefSamsung
ConnectedNoNo

More comparisons