Marathon M4-D250BLSvsVIKING VDUO5241DSS
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Marathon M4-D250BLS
Capacity
5.1cu ft
Annual Energy
134kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
32%
Well above minimum
Dimensions
23.8 × 34.2in (w × h)
VIKING VDUO5241DSS
Capacity
5cu ft
Annual Energy
199kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
35%
Most Efficient
Dimensions
24 × 34in (w × h)
Key differences
Marathon M4-D250BLS is 33% more efficient at 134 kWh/yr versus 199 kWh/yr for the VIKING VDUO5241DSS. The Marathon M4-D250BLS is larger at 5.1 cu ft versus 5 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Marathon | VIKING |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 5.1 | 5 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 5.1 | 5 |
Dimensions
| Spec | Marathon | VIKING |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 34.2 | 34 |
| Width(in) | 23.8 | 24 |
Energy
| Spec | Marathon | VIKING |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 134 | 199 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 196 | 305 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 32 | 35 |
| Most Efficient | No | Yes |
Configuration
| Spec | Marathon | VIKING |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Cooler | Compact Refrigerator |
| Product Class | 1 - Built-in Compact Cooler | 13A - Compact All-Refrigerators - automatic defrost |
| Defrost Type | — | Automatic |
| Counter Depth | Yes | Yes |
| Built In | Yes | No |
| Compact | Yes | Yes |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Marathon | VIKING |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-600a | R-600a |
| GWP Rating | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Marathon | VIKING |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |