MicroFridge 3.1MF7RWvsWhirlpool WHR31TS4E
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
MicroFridge 3.1MF7RW
Capacity
3.1cu ft
Annual Energy
195kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
46%
Most Efficient
Dimensions
18.5 × 32.9in (w × h)
Whirlpool WHR31TS4E
Capacity
3cu ft
Annual Energy
320kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
11%
Dimensions
19.1 × 33in (w × h)
Key differences
MicroFridge 3.1MF7RW is 39% more efficient at 195 kWh/yr versus 320 kWh/yr for the Whirlpool WHR31TS4E. The MicroFridge 3.1MF7RW is larger at 3.1 cu ft versus 3 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | MicroFridge | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 3.1 | 3 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 3.8 | 3.8 |
Dimensions
| Spec | MicroFridge | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 32.9 | 33 |
| Width(in) | 18.5 | 19.1 |
Energy
| Spec | MicroFridge | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 195 | 320 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 358 | 358 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 46 | 11 |
| Most Efficient | Yes | No |
Configuration
| Spec | MicroFridge | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Refrigerator | Compact Refrigerator |
| Product Class | 12 - Compact Refrigerator-Freezer - partial automatic defrost | 12 - Compact Refrigerator-Freezer - partial automatic defrost |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Counter Depth | No | No |
| Built In | No | No |
| Compact | Yes | Yes |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Connectivity
| Spec | MicroFridge | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |