Midea MRC35B3A**vsZephyr PRW15C01CG
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Midea MRC35B3A**
Capacity
3.5cu ft
Annual Energy
174kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
10%
Dimensions
21.5 × 33.5in (w × h)
Zephyr PRW15C01CG
Capacity
3.4cu ft
Annual Energy
145kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
21%
Well above minimum
Dimensions
15 × 33.9in (w × h)
Key differences
Zephyr PRW15C01CG is 17% more efficient at 145 kWh/yr versus 174 kWh/yr for the Midea MRC35B3A**. The Midea MRC35B3A** is larger at 3.5 cu ft versus 3.4 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Midea | Zephyr |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 3.5 | 3.4 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 6.2 | 3.4 |
Dimensions
| Spec | Midea | Zephyr |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 33.5 | 33.9 |
| Width(in) | 21.5 | 15 |
Energy
| Spec | Midea | Zephyr |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 174 | 145 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 194 | 183 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 10 | 21 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Midea | Zephyr |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Chest Freezer | Compact Cooler |
| Product Class | 18 - Compact chest freezers | 3 - Freestanding Compact Cooler |
| Defrost Type | Manual | — |
| Counter Depth | No | No |
| Built In | No | No |
| Compact | Yes | Yes |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Connectivity
| Spec | Midea | Zephyr |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |