Midea WHS-160RB1vsXO XOU24BCGOA
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Midea WHS-160RB1
Capacity
4.4cu ft
Annual Energy
226kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
11%
Dimensions
19.7 × 33.9in (w × h)
XO XOU24BCGOA
Capacity
4.3cu ft
Annual Energy
267kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
11%
Dimensions
23.4 × 32.3in (w × h)
Key differences
Midea WHS-160RB1 is 15% more efficient at 226 kWh/yr versus 267 kWh/yr for the XO XOU24BCGOA. The Midea WHS-160RB1 is larger at 4.4 cu ft versus 4.3 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Midea | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Dimensions
| Spec | Midea | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 33.9 | 32.3 |
| Width(in) | 19.7 | 23.4 |
Energy
| Spec | Midea | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 226 | 267 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 254 | 299 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 11 | 11 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Midea | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Refrigerator | Compact Refrigerator |
| Product Class | 11A - Compact All-Refrigerator - manual defrost | 13A - Compact All-Refrigerators - automatic defrost |
| Defrost Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Counter Depth | No | No |
| Built In | No | No |
| Compact | Yes | Yes |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Connectivity
| Spec | Midea | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |