SpecDirectory

Monogram ZIW241NBW****vsSKS SKSCW241**

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Monogram ZIW241NBW****

Capacity

13.4cu ft

Annual Energy

118kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

55%

Well above minimum
Dimensions

23.8 × 83.8in (w × h)

SKS SKSCW241**

Capacity

13.6cu ft

Annual Energy

175kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

33%

Well above minimum
Dimensions

23.8 × 83.5in (w × h)

Key differences

Monogram ZIW241NBW**** is 33% more efficient at 118 kWh/yr versus 175 kWh/yr for the SKS SKSCW241**. The SKS SKSCW241** is larger at 13.6 cu ft versus 13.4 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecMonogramSKS
Total Volume(cu ft)13.413.6
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)13.413.6

Dimensions

SpecMonogramSKS
Height(in)83.883.5
Width(in)23.823.8

Energy

SpecMonogramSKS
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)118175
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)261263
Better Than Standard(%)5533
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecMonogramSKS
TypeCoolerCooler
Product Class2 - Built-in Cooler2 - Built-in Cooler
Counter DepthNoNo
Built InYesYes
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerNoNo
Through-the-Door DispenserNoNo

Refrigerant

SpecMonogramSKS
Type—R-600a
GWP Rating—R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Connectivity

SpecMonogramSKS
ConnectedNoNo

More comparisons