Samsung RB10FSR4E**vsWhirlpool URBC5024PZ
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Samsung RB10FSR4E**
Capacity
11.3cu ft
Annual Energy
390kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
12%
Dimensions
23.4 × 70.1in (w × h)
Whirlpool URBC5024PZ
Capacity
11.2cu ft
Annual Energy
376kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
14%
Dimensions
23.6 × 70.9in (w × h)
Key differences
Whirlpool URBC5024PZ is 4% more efficient at 376 kWh/yr versus 390 kWh/yr for the Samsung RB10FSR4E**. The Samsung RB10FSR4E** is larger at 11.3 cu ft versus 11.2 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Samsung | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 11.3 | 11.2 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 14.2 | 13.8 |
Dimensions
| Spec | Samsung | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 70.1 | 70.9 |
| Width(in) | 23.4 | 23.6 |
Energy
| Spec | Samsung | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 390 | 376 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 443 | 439 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 12 | 14 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Samsung | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Bottom Freezer | Bottom Freezer |
| Product Class | 5 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer without an automatic ice maker | 5 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer without an automatic ice maker |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Counter Depth | No | Yes |
| Built In | No | No |
| Compact | No | No |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Samsung | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-600a | — |
| GWP Rating | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |