SpecDirectory

Samsung RF27CG5900**vsWhirlpool WRS975SID***

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Samsung RF27CG5900**

Capacity

25cu ft

Annual Energy

726kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

5%

Dimensions

35.8 × 70in (w × h)

Whirlpool WRS975SID***

Capacity

24.8cu ft

Annual Energy

610kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

15%

Dimensions

35.8 × 68.6in (w × h)

Key differences

Whirlpool WRS975SID*** is 16% more efficient at 610 kWh/yr versus 726 kWh/yr for the Samsung RF27CG5900**. The Samsung RF27CG5900** is larger at 25 cu ft versus 24.8 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
Total Volume(cu ft)2524.8
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)30.731.6

Dimensions

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
Height(in)7068.6
Width(in)35.835.8

Energy

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)726610
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)759703
Better Than Standard(%)515
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
TypeBottom FreezerSide-by-Side
Product Class5A - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service7 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthYesNo
Built InNoNo
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerYesYes
Through-the-Door DispenserYesYes

Refrigerant

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
TypeR-600a—
GWP RatingR-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)—

Connectivity

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
ConnectedYesNo
Connects UsingWi-Fi—
Communication StandardSmart Energy Profile (SEP) 2.x—

More comparisons