SpecDirectory

Samsung RF29DB9750**vsSub-Zero CL4850S/S/*

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Samsung RF29DB9750**

Capacity

29cu ft

Annual Energy

704kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

5%

Dimensions

35.9 × 73in (w × h)

Sub-Zero CL4850S/S/*

Capacity

29.1cu ft

Annual Energy

746kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Dimensions

48 × 84in (w × h)

Key differences

Samsung RF29DB9750** is 6% more efficient at 704 kWh/yr versus 746 kWh/yr for the Sub-Zero CL4850S/S/*. The Sub-Zero CL4850S/S/* is larger at 29.1 cu ft versus 29 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecSamsungSub-Zero
Total Volume(cu ft)2929.1
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)37.837

Dimensions

SpecSamsungSub-Zero
Height(in)7384
Width(in)35.948

Energy

SpecSamsungSub-Zero
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)704746
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)736820
Better Than Standard(%)510
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecSamsungSub-Zero
TypeBottom FreezerSide-by-Side
Product Class5I - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service4I-BI - Built-In Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoYes
Built InNoYes
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerYesYes
Through-the-Door DispenserNoNo

Refrigerant

SpecSamsungSub-Zero
TypeR-600aR-600a
GWP RatingR-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Connectivity

SpecSamsungSub-Zero
ConnectedYesNo
Connects UsingWi-Fi—
Communication StandardSmart Energy Profile (SEP) 2.x—

More comparisons