SpecDirectory

Samsung RM80F23VM*vsWhirlpool WRFC7436T***

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Samsung RM80F23VM*

Capacity

23.5cu ft

Annual Energy

510kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

27%

Most Efficient
Dimensions

35.9 × 72.1in (w × h)

Whirlpool WRFC7436T***

Capacity

23.4cu ft

Annual Energy

673kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Dimensions

36 × 69in (w × h)

Key differences

Samsung RM80F23VM* is 24% more efficient at 510 kWh/yr versus 673 kWh/yr for the Whirlpool WRFC7436T***. The Samsung RM80F23VM* is larger at 23.5 cu ft versus 23.4 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
Total Volume(cu ft)23.523.4
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)30.328.4

Dimensions

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
Height(in)72.169
Width(in)35.936

Energy

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)510673
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)669738
Better Than Standard(%)2710
Most EfficientYesNo

Configuration

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
TypeBottom FreezerBottom Freezer
Product Class5I - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service5A - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthYesYes
Built InNoNo
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerYesYes
Through-the-Door DispenserNoYes

Refrigerant

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
TypeR-600aR-600a
GWP RatingR-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Connectivity

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
ConnectedNoNo

More comparisons