SpecDirectory

Samsung RS27T5561**vsWhirlpool WRF767SDE***

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Samsung RS27T5561**

Capacity

26.7cu ft

Annual Energy

691kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

5%

Dimensions

35.9 × 70.1in (w × h)

Whirlpool WRF767SDE***

Capacity

26.8cu ft

Annual Energy

709kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Dimensions

35.7 × 70.1in (w × h)

Key differences

Samsung RS27T5561** is 3% more efficient at 691 kWh/yr versus 709 kWh/yr for the Whirlpool WRF767SDE***. The Whirlpool WRF767SDE*** is larger at 26.8 cu ft versus 26.7 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
Total Volume(cu ft)26.726.8
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)33.932.7

Dimensions

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
Height(in)70.170.1
Width(in)35.935.7

Energy

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)691709
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)722778
Better Than Standard(%)510
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
TypeSide-by-SideBottom Freezer
Product Class7 - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with side-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service5A - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoNo
Built InNoNo
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerYesYes
Through-the-Door DispenserYesYes

Refrigerant

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
TypeR-600a—
GWP RatingR-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)—

Connectivity

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
ConnectedYesNo
Connects UsingWi-Fi—
Communication StandardSmart Energy Profile (SEP) 2.x—

More comparisons