SKS SKSUW2401*vsXO XOU24WDZGOA
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
SKS SKSUW2401*
Capacity
4.1cu ft
Annual Energy
100kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
47%
Well above minimum
Dimensions
23.4 × 34.3in (w × h)
XO XOU24WDZGOA
Capacity
4cu ft
Annual Energy
140kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
25%
Well above minimum
Dimensions
23.4 × 32.3in (w × h)
Key differences
SKS SKSUW2401* is 29% more efficient at 100 kWh/yr versus 140 kWh/yr for the XO XOU24WDZGOA. The SKS SKSUW2401* is larger at 4.1 cu ft versus 4 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | SKS | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 4.1 | 4 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 4.1 | 4 |
Dimensions
| Spec | SKS | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 34.3 | 32.3 |
| Width(in) | 23.4 | 23.4 |
Energy
| Spec | SKS | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 100 | 140 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 188 | 187 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 47 | 25 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | SKS | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Cooler | Compact Cooler |
| Product Class | 1 - Built-in Compact Cooler | 3 - Freestanding Compact Cooler |
| Counter Depth | No | No |
| Built In | Yes | No |
| Compact | Yes | Yes |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | SKS | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-600a | — |
| GWP Rating | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | SKS | XO |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |