Stirling S4-100SSvsZline RBSO-ST-24
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Stirling S4-100SS
Capacity
5.3cu ft
Annual Energy
134kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
32%
Well above minimum
Dimensions
23.8 × 34.2in (w × h)
Zline RBSO-ST-24
Capacity
5.2cu ft
Annual Energy
257kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
16%
Dimensions
23.9 × 34in (w × h)
Key differences
Stirling S4-100SS is 48% more efficient at 134 kWh/yr versus 257 kWh/yr for the Zline RBSO-ST-24. The Stirling S4-100SS is larger at 5.3 cu ft versus 5.2 cu ft. Overall, the Zline RBSO-ST-24 sits higher in the category, ranking above 33% of certified residential refrigerators.
Capacity
| Spec | Stirling | Zline |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 5.3 | 5.2 |
Dimensions
| Spec | Stirling | Zline |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 34.2 | 34 |
| Width(in) | 23.8 | 23.9 |
Energy
| Spec | Stirling | Zline |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 134 | 257 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 198 | 307 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 32 | 16 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Stirling | Zline |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Cooler | Compact Refrigerator |
| Product Class | 1 - Built-in Compact Cooler | 13A - Compact All-Refrigerators - automatic defrost |
| Defrost Type | — | Automatic |
| Counter Depth | Yes | No |
| Built In | Yes | No |
| Compact | Yes | Yes |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Stirling | Zline |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-600a | R-600a |
| GWP Rating | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Stirling | Zline |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |