XO XOU15WOFRvsZephyr PRW15C01CG
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
XO XOU15WOFR
Capacity
3.3cu ft
Annual Energy
143kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
21%
Well above minimum
Dimensions
23.8 × 34.1in (w × h)
Zephyr PRW15C01CG
Capacity
3.4cu ft
Annual Energy
145kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
21%
Well above minimum
Dimensions
15 × 33.9in (w × h)
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on annual energy: 143 vs 145 kWh/yr. The Zephyr PRW15C01CG is larger at 3.4 cu ft versus 3.3 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | XO | Zephyr |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 3.3 | 3.4 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 3.3 | 3.4 |
Dimensions
| Spec | XO | Zephyr |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 34.1 | 33.9 |
| Width(in) | 23.8 | 15 |
Energy
| Spec | XO | Zephyr |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 143 | 145 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 182 | 183 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 21 | 21 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | XO | Zephyr |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Cooler | Compact Cooler |
| Product Class | 3 - Freestanding Compact Cooler | 3 - Freestanding Compact Cooler |
| Counter Depth | No | No |
| Built In | No | No |
| Compact | Yes | Yes |
| Ice Maker | No | No |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | No | No |
Connectivity
| Spec | XO | Zephyr |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |