ACIQ B5H3V24*K*AAA*vsMitsubishi Electric MXZ-3D24NL***
Side-by-side heat pump comparison
ACIQ B5H3V24*K*AAA*
SEER2
18–23BTU/Wh
HSPF2
8.5–10.5BTU/Wh
Cooling Capacity
21600–23800BTU/hr
Cold Climate
Yes
Cold climate certified
Mitsubishi Electric MXZ-3D24NL***
SEER2
16–20BTU/Wh
HSPF2
8.6–10BTU/Wh
Cooling Capacity
22000–23600BTU/hr
Cold Climate
Yes
Cold climate certified
Key differences
ACIQ B5H3V24*K*AAA* is 13% more efficient at 23.0 BTU/Wh versus 20.0 BTU/Wh for the Mitsubishi Electric MXZ-3D24NL***. The ACIQ B5H3V24*K*AAA* is larger at 23800 BTU/hr versus 23600 BTU/hr.
Efficiency
| Spec | ACIQ | Mitsubishi Electric |
|---|---|---|
| SEER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 23 | 20 |
| SEER2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh) | 18 | 16 |
| HSPF2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 10.5 | 10 |
| HSPF2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh) | 8.5 | 8.6 |
| EER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 14 | 13.7 |
| COP at 5 °F | 2.10 | 2.06 |
Capacity
| Spec | ACIQ | Mitsubishi Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Capacity (max)(BTU/hr) | 23800 | 23600 |
| Cooling Capacity (min)(BTU/hr) | 21600 | 22000 |
| Heating at 47 °F(BTU/hr) | 28200 | 25400 |
| Heating at 17 °F(BTU/hr) | 26400 | 16000 |
| Heating at 5 °F(BTU/hr) | 23000 | 19800 |
Configuration
| Spec | ACIQ | Mitsubishi Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | HP - Split System | HP - Mini or Multi Split |
| Compressor Staging | Continuously variable | Continuously variable |
| Cold Climate Certified | Yes | Yes |
| Connected Capability | No | No |
| Series | Deluxe 23 VS Heat Pump | M-Series |
| Indoor-Unit Combinations Rated | 419 | 3 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | ACIQ | Mitsubishi Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-454B | R-454B |
| GWP Rating | R-454B (GWP:470 | Lower GWP) | R-454B (GWP:470 | Lower GWP) |