AIR MAX AWGRC36-H2vsBRYANT HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS 227TAN036**AA*
Side-by-side heat pump comparison
AIR MAX AWGRC36-H2
SEER2
21BTU/Wh
HSPF2
8.5BTU/Wh
Cooling Capacity
33600BTU/hr
Refrigerant
R-32
GWP 675 · Lower
BRYANT HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS 227TAN036**AA*
SEER2
15.5BTU/Wh
HSPF2
7.8BTU/Wh
Cooling Capacity
33800BTU/hr
Refrigerant
R-410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Key differences
AIR MAX AWGRC36-H2 is 26% more efficient at 21.0 BTU/Wh versus 15.5 BTU/Wh for the BRYANT HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS 227TAN036**AA*. The BRYANT HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS 227TAN036**AA* is larger at 33800 BTU/hr versus 33600 BTU/hr. AIR MAX AWGRC36-H2 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-32 (GWP 675) versus R-410A (GWP 2088). Overall, the AIR MAX AWGRC36-H2 sits higher in the category, ranking above 65% of certified air-source heat pumps.
Efficiency
| Spec | AIR MAX | BRYANT HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS |
|---|---|---|
| SEER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 21 | 15.5 |
| SEER2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh) | 21 | 15.5 |
| HSPF2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 8.5 | 7.8 |
| HSPF2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh) | 8.5 | 7.8 |
| EER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 11.3 | 11.7 |
| COP at 5 °F | 1.80 | — |
Capacity
| Spec | AIR MAX | BRYANT HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Capacity (max)(BTU/hr) | 33600 | 33800 |
| Cooling Capacity (min)(BTU/hr) | 33600 | 33800 |
| Heating at 47 °F(BTU/hr) | 34000 | 35000 |
| Heating at 17 °F(BTU/hr) | 26000 | 21600 |
| Heating at 5 °F(BTU/hr) | 22000 | — |
Configuration
| Spec | AIR MAX | BRYANT HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | HP - Mini or Multi Split | HP - Split System |
| Compressor Staging | Continuously variable | Two-stage |
| Cold Climate Certified | No | No |
| Connected Capability | No | No |
| Series | All MATCH | 2-STAGE 17 SEER HP |
| Indoor-Unit Combinations Rated | 1 | 1 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | AIR MAX | BRYANT HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-32 | R-410A |
| GWP Rating | R-32 (GWP:675 | Lower GWP) | R-410A (GWP:2088) |