Amana AZV7SA4810A*vsWhirlpool RHPBYC048AJT
Side-by-side heat pump comparison
Amana AZV7SA4810A*
SEER2
16.2–17.5BTU/Wh
HSPF2
8.5–8.8BTU/Wh
Cooling Capacity
45500–46500BTU/hr
Cold Climate
Yes
Cold climate certified
Whirlpool RHPBYC048AJT
SEER2
15.2BTU/Wh
HSPF2
7.2BTU/Wh
Cooling Capacity
46000BTU/hr
Refrigerant
R-454B
GWP 470 · Lower
Key differences
Amana AZV7SA4810A* is 13% more efficient at 17.5 BTU/Wh versus 15.2 BTU/Wh for the Whirlpool RHPBYC048AJT. The Amana AZV7SA4810A* is larger at 46500 BTU/hr versus 46000 BTU/hr. Whirlpool RHPBYC048AJT uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-454B (GWP 470) versus R-32 (GWP 675). Overall, the Amana AZV7SA4810A* sits higher in the category, ranking above 83% of certified air-source heat pumps.
Efficiency
| Spec | Amana | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| SEER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 17.5 | 15.2 |
| SEER2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh) | 16.2 | 15.2 |
| HSPF2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 8.8 | 7.2 |
| HSPF2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh) | 8.5 | 7.2 |
| EER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 10 | 11 |
| COP at 5 °F | 2 | 1.74 |
Capacity
| Spec | Amana | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Capacity (max)(BTU/hr) | 46500 | 46000 |
| Cooling Capacity (min)(BTU/hr) | 45500 | 46000 |
| Heating at 47 °F(BTU/hr) | 47500 | 45500 |
| Heating at 17 °F(BTU/hr) | 29000 | 26000 |
| Heating at 5 °F(BTU/hr) | 33600 | 19000 |
Configuration
| Spec | Amana | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | HP - Split System | HP - Single Package |
| Compressor Staging | Continuously variable | Two-stage |
| Cold Climate Certified | Yes | No |
| Connected Capability | No | No |
| Series | AZV7SA | CLASSIC PLUS |
| Indoor-Unit Combinations Rated | 62 | 1 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Amana | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-32 | R-454B |
| GWP Rating | R-32 (GWP:675 | Lower GWP) | R-454B (GWP:470 | Lower GWP) |