AUX AMAR09HP115V1COvsSamsung AC009DXSCCG
Side-by-side heat pump comparison
AUX AMAR09HP115V1CO
SEER2
25BTU/Wh
HSPF2
10.5BTU/Wh
Cooling Capacity
9200BTU/hr
Cold Climate
Yes
Cold climate certified
Samsung AC009DXSCCG
SEER2
18.9–22.1BTU/Wh
HSPF2
9.5–10.6BTU/Wh
Cooling Capacity
9000–9100BTU/hr
Cold Climate
Yes
Cold climate certified
Key differences
AUX AMAR09HP115V1CO is 12% more efficient at 25.0 BTU/Wh versus 22.1 BTU/Wh for the Samsung AC009DXSCCG. The AUX AMAR09HP115V1CO is larger at 9200 BTU/hr versus 9100 BTU/hr. Overall, the AUX AMAR09HP115V1CO sits higher in the category, ranking above 89% of certified air-source heat pumps.
Efficiency
| Spec | AUX | Samsung |
|---|---|---|
| SEER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 25 | 22.1 |
| SEER2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh) | 25 | 18.9 |
| HSPF2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 10.5 | 10.6 |
| HSPF2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh) | 10.5 | 9.5 |
| EER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 14 | 14 |
| COP at 5 °F | 2 | 1.80 |
Capacity
| Spec | AUX | Samsung |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Capacity (max)(BTU/hr) | 9200 | 9100 |
| Cooling Capacity (min)(BTU/hr) | 9200 | 9000 |
| Heating at 47 °F(BTU/hr) | 10000 | 12000 |
| Heating at 17 °F(BTU/hr) | 9400 | 9700 |
| Heating at 5 °F(BTU/hr) | 9400 | 9600 |
Configuration
| Spec | AUX | Samsung |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | HP - Mini or Multi Split | HP - Mini or Multi Split |
| Compressor Staging | Continuously variable | Continuously variable |
| Cold Climate Certified | Yes | Yes |
| Connected Capability | No | No |
| Series | C-Series | Slim Duct (LSP) Premium (CAC) |
| Indoor-Unit Combinations Rated | 1 | 5 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | AUX | Samsung |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-32 | R-32 |
| GWP Rating | R-32 (GWP:675 | Lower GWP) | R-32 (GWP:675 | Lower GWP) |