SpecDirectory

Cozeware CMBA36TP2AU-W*vsTempstar Q5H9V36*K*AAA*

Side-by-side heat pump comparison

Cozeware CMBA36TP2AU-W*

SEER2

23BTU/Wh

HSPF2

10BTU/Wh

Cooling Capacity

38000BTU/hr

Cold Climate

Yes

Cold climate certified

Tempstar Q5H9V36*K*AAA*

SEER2

15.2–18BTU/Wh

HSPF2

7.8–9BTU/Wh

Cooling Capacity

33400–37600BTU/hr

Cold Climate

Yes

Cold climate certified

Key differences

Cozeware CMBA36TP2AU-W* is 22% more efficient at 23.0 BTU/Wh versus 18.0 BTU/Wh for the Tempstar Q5H9V36*K*AAA*. The Cozeware CMBA36TP2AU-W* is larger at 38000 BTU/hr versus 37600 BTU/hr. Tempstar Q5H9V36*K*AAA* uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-454B (GWP 470) versus R-32 (GWP 675).

Efficiency

SpecCozewareTempstar
SEER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh)2318
SEER2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh)2315.2
HSPF2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh)109
HSPF2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh)107.8
EER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh)11.213.5
COP at 5 °F22.18

Capacity

SpecCozewareTempstar
Cooling Capacity (max)(BTU/hr)3800037600
Cooling Capacity (min)(BTU/hr)3800033400
Heating at 47 °F(BTU/hr)4200037400
Heating at 17 °F(BTU/hr)3300037600
Heating at 5 °F(BTU/hr)3100026600

Configuration

SpecCozewareTempstar
Product TypeHP - Mini or Multi SplitHP - Split System
Compressor StagingContinuously variableContinuously variable
Cold Climate CertifiedYesYes
Connected CapabilityNoNo
SeriesEverestQuietComfort 19 SEER2 VS HP
Indoor-Unit Combinations Rated1450

Refrigerant

SpecCozewareTempstar
TypeR-32R-454B
GWP RatingR-32 (GWP:675 | Lower GWP)R-454B (GWP:470 | Lower GWP)

More comparisons