Dayton 3DPE2vsRevent RVSH50
Side-by-side ventilating fan comparison
Dayton 3DPE2
Airflow
63CFM
Efficacy
4CFM/W
Sound Level
0.4sones
Type
Bathroom/Utility Room
Revent RVSH50
Airflow
50CFM
Efficacy
9.1CFM/W
Sound Level
1sones
Type
Bathroom/Utility Room
Key differences
Revent RVSH50 is 56% more efficient at 9.1 CFM/W versus 4.0 CFM/W for the Dayton 3DPE2. The Dayton 3DPE2 is larger at 63 CFM versus 50 CFM.
Performance
| Spec | Dayton | Revent |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow(CFM) | 63 | 50 |
| Efficacy(CFM/W) | 4 | 9.1 |
| Sound Level(sones) | 0.4 | 1 |
| Number of Speeds | 1 | 1 |
Installation
| Spec | Dayton | Revent |
|---|---|---|
| Unit Type | Bathroom/Utility Room | Bathroom/Utility Room |
| Duct Size | 6.0 inch diameter | 4.00 inch diameter |
| Airflow at 0.25 in w.g.(CFM) | — | 50 |
| Sound at 0.25 in w.g.(sones) | 1.1 | 0 |
Lighting
| Spec | Dayton | Revent |
|---|---|---|
| Includes Lighting | No | No |
| Ships with ENERGY STAR Lamp | No | No |