SpecDirectory

ECOTEMP W4H7T36*K*AAA*vsTrane / Mitsubishi Electric NTXSKH36A112AA

Side-by-side heat pump comparison

ECOTEMP W4H7T36*K*AAA*

SEER2

15.2BTU/Wh

HSPF2

8.1BTU/Wh

Cooling Capacity

33200BTU/hr

Refrigerant

R-410A

GWP 2088 · Higher

Trane / Mitsubishi Electric NTXSKH36A112AA

SEER2

15.2BTU/Wh

HSPF2

8.9BTU/Wh

Cooling Capacity

33000BTU/hr

Cold Climate

Yes

Cold climate certified

Key differences

The ECOTEMP W4H7T36*K*AAA* is larger at 33200 BTU/hr versus 33000 BTU/hr.

Efficiency

SpecECOTEMPTrane / Mitsubishi Electric
SEER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh)15.215.2
SEER2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh)15.215.2
HSPF2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh)8.18.9
HSPF2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh)8.18.9
EER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh)11.712.5
COP at 5 °F—1.75

Capacity

SpecECOTEMPTrane / Mitsubishi Electric
Cooling Capacity (max)(BTU/hr)3320033000
Cooling Capacity (min)(BTU/hr)3320033000
Heating at 47 °F(BTU/hr)3460040000
Heating at 17 °F(BTU/hr)2120024800
Heating at 5 °F(BTU/hr)—37000

Configuration

SpecECOTEMPTrane / Mitsubishi Electric
Product TypeHP - Split SystemHP - Mini or Multi Split
Compressor StagingTwo-stageContinuously variable
Cold Climate CertifiedNoYes
Connected CapabilityNoNo
Series2-STAGE 17 SEER HPNV-Series
Indoor-Unit Combinations Rated11

Refrigerant

SpecECOTEMPTrane / Mitsubishi Electric
TypeR-410AR-410A
GWP RatingR-410A (GWP:2088)R-410A (GWP:2088)

More comparisons