Fujitsu AOU15RLFFvsMitsubishi Electric MUZ-FS15NA***
Side-by-side heat pump comparison
Fujitsu AOU15RLFF
SEER2
20.3BTU/Wh
HSPF2
10.7BTU/Wh
Cooling Capacity
14200BTU/hr
Cold Climate
Yes
Cold climate certified
Mitsubishi Electric MUZ-FS15NA***
SEER2
22.3BTU/Wh
HSPF2
10.4BTU/Wh
Cooling Capacity
14000BTU/hr
Cold Climate
Yes
Cold climate certified
Key differences
Mitsubishi Electric MUZ-FS15NA*** is 9% more efficient at 22.3 BTU/Wh versus 20.3 BTU/Wh for the Fujitsu AOU15RLFF. The Fujitsu AOU15RLFF is larger at 14200 BTU/hr versus 14000 BTU/hr.
Efficiency
| Spec | Fujitsu | Mitsubishi Electric |
|---|---|---|
| SEER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 20.3 | 22.3 |
| SEER2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh) | 20.3 | 22.3 |
| HSPF2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 10.7 | 10.4 |
| HSPF2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh) | 10.7 | 10.4 |
| EER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 12.5 | 14 |
| COP at 5 °F | 1.84 | 2 |
Capacity
| Spec | Fujitsu | Mitsubishi Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Capacity (max)(BTU/hr) | 14200 | 14000 |
| Cooling Capacity (min)(BTU/hr) | 14200 | 14000 |
| Heating at 47 °F(BTU/hr) | 15000 | 16000 |
| Heating at 17 °F(BTU/hr) | 11600 | 10000 |
| Heating at 5 °F(BTU/hr) | 18100 | 19400 |
Configuration
| Spec | Fujitsu | Mitsubishi Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | HP - Mini or Multi Split | HP - Mini or Multi Split |
| Compressor Staging | Continuously variable | Continuously variable |
| Cold Climate Certified | Yes | Yes |
| Connected Capability | No | No |
| Series | H-Series | M-Series |
| Indoor-Unit Combinations Rated | 1 | 1 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Fujitsu | Mitsubishi Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-410A | R-410A |
| GWP Rating | R-410A (GWP:2088) | R-410A (GWP:2088) |