Mitsubishi Electric PUZ-AK42NL***vsTrane 5TWX6042A1
Side-by-side heat pump comparison
Mitsubishi Electric PUZ-AK42NL***
SEER2
18.7–21BTU/Wh
HSPF2
9.3–10.1BTU/Wh
Cooling Capacity
42000BTU/hr
Refrigerant
R-454B
GWP 470 · Lower
Trane 5TWX6042A1
SEER2
15.2–16BTU/Wh
HSPF2
7.8–8.1BTU/Wh
Cooling Capacity
38500–41500BTU/hr
Refrigerant
R-454B
GWP 470 · Lower
Key differences
Mitsubishi Electric PUZ-AK42NL*** is 24% more efficient at 21.0 BTU/Wh versus 16.0 BTU/Wh for the Trane 5TWX6042A1. The Mitsubishi Electric PUZ-AK42NL*** is larger at 42000 BTU/hr versus 41500 BTU/hr. Overall, the Mitsubishi Electric PUZ-AK42NL*** sits higher in the category, ranking above 79% of certified air-source heat pumps.
Efficiency
| Spec | Mitsubishi Electric | Trane |
|---|---|---|
| SEER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 21 | 16 |
| SEER2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh) | 18.7 | 15.2 |
| HSPF2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 10.1 | 8.1 |
| HSPF2 (worst combination)(BTU/Wh) | 9.3 | 7.8 |
| EER2 (best combination)(BTU/Wh) | 12 | 12 |
| COP at 5 °F | 2.70 | 2.30 |
Capacity
| Spec | Mitsubishi Electric | Trane |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Capacity (max)(BTU/hr) | 42000 | 41500 |
| Cooling Capacity (min)(BTU/hr) | 42000 | 38500 |
| Heating at 47 °F(BTU/hr) | 48000 | 40500 |
| Heating at 17 °F(BTU/hr) | 29600 | 26000 |
| Heating at 5 °F(BTU/hr) | 25400 | 19800 |
Configuration
| Spec | Mitsubishi Electric | Trane |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | HP - Mini or Multi Split | HP - Split System |
| Compressor Staging | Continuously variable | Single stage |
| Cold Climate Certified | No | No |
| Connected Capability | No | No |
| Series | P series | 16 Single-Stage Heat Pump with WeatherGuard Top |
| Indoor-Unit Combinations Rated | 3 | 187 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Mitsubishi Electric | Trane |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-454B | R-454B |
| GWP Rating | R-454B (GWP:470 | Lower GWP) | R-454B (GWP:470 | Lower GWP) |