Alto-Shaam 1000-S/SRvsCambro PCU1000HH615
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Alto-Shaam 1000-S/SR
Internal Volume
7.8cu ft
Max Idle Rate
167W
Energy Usage
147W
Doors
1
Cambro PCU1000HH615
Internal Volume
8.1cu ft
Max Idle Rate
174W
Energy Usage
115W
Doors
2
Key differences
Alto-Shaam 1000-S/SR is 4% more efficient at 167 W versus 174 W for the Cambro PCU1000HH615. The Cambro PCU1000HH615 is larger at 8.1 cu ft versus 7.8 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Cambro |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Doors | 1 | 2 |
| Door / Wall Type | Transparent | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Cambro |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 147 | 115 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 167 | 174 |