Alto-Shaam 1200-UPvsCambro PCUHH615
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Alto-Shaam 1200-UP
Internal Volume
18.8cu ft
Max Idle Rate
292W
Energy Usage
286W
Doors
2
Cambro PCUHH615
Internal Volume
18.9cu ft
Max Idle Rate
292W
Energy Usage
203W
Doors
2
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on idle: 292 vs 292 W. The Cambro PCUHH615 is larger at 18.9 cu ft versus 18.8 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Cambro |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 18.8 | 18.9 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Door / Wall Type | Transparent | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Cambro |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 286 | 203 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 292 | 292 |