Cambro PCUHH615vsContinental DL1W-SS-PT
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Cambro PCUHH615
Internal Volume
18.9cu ft
Max Idle Rate
292W
Energy Usage
203W
Doors
2
Continental DL1W-SS-PT
Internal Volume
18.6cu ft
Max Idle Rate
291W
Energy Usage
182W
Doors
2
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on idle: 292 vs 291 W. The Cambro PCUHH615 is larger at 18.9 cu ft versus 18.6 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Cambro | Continental |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 18.9 | 18.6 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Cambro | Continental |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 203 | 182 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 292 | 291 |