Cambro PCUHH615vsMetro C567-SFS-U
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Cambro PCUHH615
Internal Volume
18.9cu ft
Max Idle Rate
292W
Energy Usage
203W
Doors
2
Metro C567-SFS-U
Internal Volume
19cu ft
Max Idle Rate
292W
Energy Usage
271W
Doors
1
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on idle: 292 vs 292 W. The Metro C567-SFS-U is larger at 19 cu ft versus 18.9 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Cambro | Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 18.9 | 19 |
| Doors | 2 | 1 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Cambro | Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 203 | 271 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 292 | 292 |