Alto-Shaam BQ-128vsHoshizaki America HC2A-HS-HS
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Alto-Shaam BQ-128
Internal Volume
55.9cu ft
Max Idle Rate
294W
Energy Usage
294W
Doors
1
Hoshizaki America HC2A-HS-HS
Internal Volume
53.7cu ft
Max Idle Rate
408W
Energy Usage
318W
Doors
2
Key differences
Alto-Shaam BQ-128 is 28% more efficient at 294 W versus 408 W for the Hoshizaki America HC2A-HS-HS. The Alto-Shaam BQ-128 is larger at 55.9 cu ft versus 53.7 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Hoshizaki America |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 55.9 | 53.7 |
| Doors | 1 | 2 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Hoshizaki America |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 294 | 318 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 294 | 408 |