Alto-Shaam BQ-128vsTraulsen RHF232WP-FHS
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Alto-Shaam BQ-128
Internal Volume
55.9cu ft
Max Idle Rate
294W
Energy Usage
294W
Doors
1
Traulsen RHF232WP-FHS
Internal Volume
55cu ft
Max Idle Rate
412W
Energy Usage
275W
Doors
4
Key differences
Alto-Shaam BQ-128 is 29% more efficient at 294 W versus 412 W for the Traulsen RHF232WP-FHS. The Alto-Shaam BQ-128 is larger at 55.9 cu ft versus 55 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Traulsen |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 55.9 | 55 |
| Doors | 1 | 4 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Traulsen |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 294 | 275 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 294 | 412 |