ATOSA YRU0140A-161vsHoshizaki KM-161BAK
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
ATOSA YRU0140A-161
Harvest Rate
120lb/day
Energy Use
7.04kWh/100 lb
Water Use
19.9gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Hoshizaki KM-161BAK
Harvest Rate
125lb/day
Energy Use
5.50kWh/100 lb
Water Use
22gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Key differences
Hoshizaki KM-161BAK is 22% more efficient at 5.50 kWh/100 lb versus 7.04 kWh/100 lb for the ATOSA YRU0140A-161. The Hoshizaki KM-161BAK is larger at 125 lb/day versus 120 lb/day.
Production
| Spec | ATOSA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 120 | 125 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Self Contained Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | ATOSA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 7.04 | 5.50 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 19.9 | 22 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | ATOSA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | ATOSA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |