Hoshizaki KM-161BAKvsMAXX ICE MIM150NE
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Hoshizaki KM-161BAK
Harvest Rate
125lb/day
Energy Use
5.50kWh/100 lb
Water Use
22gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
MAXX ICE MIM150NE
Harvest Rate
128lb/day
Energy Use
6.14kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12.6gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Key differences
Hoshizaki KM-161BAK is 10% more efficient at 5.50 kWh/100 lb versus 6.14 kWh/100 lb for the MAXX ICE MIM150NE. The MAXX ICE MIM150NE is larger at 128 lb/day versus 125 lb/day.
Production
| Spec | Hoshizaki | MAXX ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 125 | 128 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Self Contained Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 0 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Hoshizaki | MAXX ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 5.50 | 6.14 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 22 | 12.6 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Hoshizaki | MAXX ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Hoshizaki | MAXX ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |